Quarter of over 55s unaware of tax on pension savings

I was surprised to read read quite recently that more than one in four (27 per cent) people aged over 55 do not realise that they have to pay tax on pensions savings if they take the money as cash, according to new research from Legal & General (L&G).

L&G’s report, Price of Freedom, highlighted that this could potentially lead to them facing high tax bills than they had prepared for.

It also found that 21 per cent of over 55s would be “shocked” at having to pay tax on their pension savings.

Furthermore, 37 per cent of those who expect to get their savings tax-free think that they wouldn’t have to pay any tax on a lump sum greater than the 25 per cent threshold.

L&G Retail and Retirement Income managing director, commented: “None of us spend as much time as we should thinking about pensions and retirement planning. But leaving important decisions about later life to the last minute could potentially leave you poorer in retirement.

“It might even put the hard-earned pension pot you’ve built up during your working life at risk. Many customers don’t know about some of the fundamental factors that can impact how much money we have in retirement. Tax is one of these.”

Can we make the impossible possible in pensions again (Cont)

In my last blog I recounted comments by Steve Bee regarding Final Salary Pensions.  To continue his narrative, he wrote:

“Yes, employees are usually required to pay something towards the cost of such a pension but nowhere near the true cost of the benefit. For a “good” DB scheme, the total annual cost averages out at something like 23 to 25 per cent of payroll. The employer pays the lion’s share of that. And very few employees in such schemes understand or appreciate that.

“But here is the thing those people not in workplace DB schemes fail to understand: to get a “good” pension in retirement, something equivalent to the sort of pension they would get from a “good” DB scheme, they need to save something like one pound in every five earned through the whole of their working life.

“I do not know what the statistics are on that but I would hazard a guess that someone who did so from the age of 18 to 68 (a typical 21st century working life?) would be pretty unusual.

“I certainly do not think many with growing families and a mortgage, or high rental costs, and probably saddled with the task of repaying the price of their higher education, would be in a position to defer a fifth of their earnings year on year. It just does not seem possible.

“And yet we once made this “impossible” idea possible through the active engagement of employers in the provision of DB schemes. Schemes that worked real financial magic for generations of British workers. We need to discover how we might engage employers in making the pension magic work once again.”

I’m not sure if we will ever see the likes of DB Schemes again but it surely must say something to pension contributors (including Employers) that they have to think really hard about ensuring people save enough for retirement.

And maybe the Government should rethink the ridiculously low Lifetime Allowance!

Can we make the impossible possible in pensions again

A well respected name in the Financial Services Industry, Steve Bee, commented recently in “Money Marketing” about Final Salary Pension Schemes (also known as DB Schemes).

He wrote the following:

“It is not unusual for someone who has been in a defined benefit scheme for a large part of their career to have pension assets worth more than the house they are living in.

“The value of deferred pension benefits is something very few of us really understand, even those of us who work in the financial services industry.

“The fact someone’s pension could be worth more than a home they have spent their life scrimping to pay for seems too counter-intuitive for many clients to comprehend.

“How can something you get as a perk from work be worth more? It is not that painful to pay for; most people do not even notice the money going out. Surely it is just financial mumbo-jumbo to say they are worth that much? But, of course, it is not. It is just that, for many in workplace DB schemes, the value of the contribution made by their employer is grossly underrated.

“A “good” DB scheme provides a pension of a 60th of an employee’s salary at or near retirement for every year of pensionable employment completed. A 40-year career could thus provide a pension of around two thirds of the income the employee was used to receiving while at work. Such schemes are regarded as the gold standard in the world of workplace pensions.”

To be continued…

Final Salary Pension Transfers

Savers 10 years away from retirement could lose nearly half of the value of their defined benefit pension (Final Salary) if they choose to transfer, according to new research.

The analysis from Royal London and consultancy Lane Clark & Peacock finds for those people the transfer value on offer will on average only be around 55 per cent of the “full value” of the pension given up.

It shows that for members within one year of retirement, the transfer value is, on average, 75 per cent of the “full value” of the pension given up.

Despite these statistics, the research also shows that advisers are expecting the impact of the FCA’s new rules on pension transfers to have little impact on people’s decision making.

If you are considering such a transfer, please be very wary.  It may not be in your best interests.

Pension freedoms are the right course to follow

Andrew-Bailey-BBA-Conference-2012-700x450.jpgSo says FCA chief executive Andrew Bailey.  He says the pension freedoms are the right approach to help individuals deal with the increasing complexities of retirement.

In a speech delivered recently about the watchdog’s view on pensions, Bailey argued the context in which individuals have to make decisions about retirement is becoming more nuanced.

He said the basic pattern where individuals typically move from being net debtors to net asset owners across their working lives and then draw down on those assets in retirement has not changed.

However, he pointed out the contours of the pattern have changed and argued there is now more uncertainty about how those contours will take shape as generations and individuals age.

He added, “Moreover, the increase in uncertainty poses very clear challenges not just for the provision of pensions, but also for the provision of advice to individuals on the decisions that go with pensions.

“There is no doubt a tension, even a contradiction, between the degree of uncertainty and the apparent certainty embedded in the design of financial instruments.”

In the speech, Bailey questioned if pension freedoms are the right approach.

He said, “The freedoms remain the right course to follow, but supplemented by an expansion in the scale and scope of auto-enrolment, so it isn’t a total free-for-all.”

He added, “My reason for taking this view is that while the contours of the lifetime model will always change, it is unlikely that we will turn the clock back in the foreseeable future, and greater freedom of choice over decumulation – when and by how much and in what form pensions are put into payment – makes a great deal of sense in terms of the shifts in and uncertainty around the lifetime model.”

However, Bailey said it must be kept in mind that the responsibility for a “very complex area of decision-making” has transferred to individuals.

He said, “We need to do all we can to help people make those decisions. And that is where the FCA, among others, comes in.”

We as Advisers are among the “others” which Andrew Bailey refers to and agree wholeheartedly with him.

 

The Single Most Costly Retirement Mistake to Avoid (and Why)

Nearly everyone has a dream for their retirement. It often includes leaving work while you’re still healthy enough to be active and independent, planning to buy a boat, or holiday home, or simply spending as much leisure time as possible. And after decades of dedicating most of your waking hours to your work, enjoying the fruits of your labour is a laudable goal.

The stark reality is that far too few of us fully reach our retirement dream, and for a variety of reasons. But when you get right down to it, the vast majority of Pensioners who don’t enjoy an ideal retirement failed to take steps that would have made a big difference. Frankly, they made mistakes that caused them to fall short.

But there’s one mistake above all others at the heart of people’s failure to achieve their retirement goals.  And that mistake is not starting early enough to contribute to their retirement savings.

Time really can be worth more than money

 When it comes to arriving at retirement with the most money, the best thing you can do is start putting away as much as you can as early as you can. It’s truly that simple. The difference between starting young and putting it off can be enormous.

For instance, if you started investing £100 per month in a fund that grew at just 3% per annum at age 20, you’d have about £93,000 at age 60, If you put it off until 40, that same £100 per month would be worth only around £32,000 at age 60. But here’s the rub.  That extra £61,000 would have been generated from only £24,000 out of your pocket.

It’s the extra years in the market that allows your money to take advantage of compounded growth and deliver the big payoff. If you delay to age 40, you’d need to kick up your contribution to around £285 per month — an extra £44,000 — to arrive at retirement with a similar balance.

Time smooths out your returns

But it’s not just about the power of compounding growth. The longer you invest and regularly contribute, the better your odds of capturing the best returns. The market has its ups and downs, and it’s impossible to predict when they’ll happen.

If you start contributing early and regularly and invest through every part of every cycle during your working years, the law of averages will be in your favour. If you keep putting it off, waiting for the next crash, you’ll miss out on a lot of great returns.

Just imagine if you were one of the people who sold at the bottom in 2009 and sat on the sidelines for the past decade, watching the market more than double in value.

Even from the pre-Financial Crisis peak, the market has more than doubled in total returns:

By steadily contributing to your retirement investments for as many years as you can and through every kind of market, you’ll avoid the mistake many people made over the past decade: missing out on an historically profitable bull market while waiting for the next crash. At this point, even if the market falls by half, you’d still be far ahead of its 2007 peak.

Start as soon as you can (that means now)

Even if you’re not 30, start contributing as much as you can to your retirement savings now. Whether it’s maximizing the company contribution, or contributing to a Personal Pension, there’s no good reason to put it off.

The longer you wait, the more money it will take to reach your goals. It’s that simple.